E1 Climate change
ESRS 2 SBM-3 Material impacts, risks, and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
Sandvik has identified several impacts related to climate change where we have an actual or potential material impact on people and environment, either from own operations or other parts of the value chain. We have also identified climate-related risks and opportunities that may impact the financial position.
The effects of climate change and the need to transition to a low-carbon economy places increasing demands on societies and companies to adapt and innovate. As a result of climate-related physical risks, Sandvik has identified a potential financial risk. The risk assessment for climate considered several different aspects that may affect the total risk. Factors considered included entities at climate risk, insured value and possible lost business, costs for climate adaptation activities, supply chain and customer disruptions, legal requirements, external expectations and physical climate impacts that can generate effects throughout our value chain. Further details on resilience and climate scenario analysis is found under IRO-1 in the chapter General information.
One major consequence of the transition to a low-carbon economy is the rapid electrification of society, which is driving demand for critical minerals and fossil-free energy sources. Sandvik is a global leader in electric mining equipment and supplies advanced tools and tooling systems for the energy sector, including solutions for renewables. The growing market for battery-electric vehicles presents significant opportunities for our mining operations.
Climate action is embedded in the Sandvik strategy. We aim to be a key enabler of our customers’ transitions through a strong focus on innovation and a leading offering in new technologies, digitalization, automation, and sustainable solutions. About 4 percent of our annual revenues are spent on Research and Development (R&D) to ensure a leading product offering. Across all our businesses and value chains, we have opportunities to enable the transformation into a low-carbon economy through innovative, sustainable solutions and close collaboration with customers and suppliers. By focusing on improving customers’ productivity and sustainability we secure market-leading positions. Our global reach, local presence and decentralized business model allow us to be flexible and adapt to changing conditions. All our business areas have action plans in place to manage changes in market conditions. As the world transitions to a low-carbon economy, we have opportunities to expand our offering of, for instance, electrified mining equipment, low-carbon cutting tools, and energy-efficient products.
Impacts, risks, and opportunities |
Value chain |
Description |
Impacts on people or environment |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scope 1 emissions |
Own operations |
Direct GHG emissions from fossil fuel and gas consumption. |
All emissions contribute to global warming that affects both people and the environment, and are considered as actual impacts. |
|||
Scope 2 emissions |
Own operations |
Consumption of electricity and heating generating GHG emissions. |
||||
Scope 3 emissions upstream |
Upstream |
Sourcing of minerals and metals cause substantial GHG emissions in our upstream value chain, from extraction and refining to transportation and component manufacturing. |
||||
Scope 3 emissions downstream |
Downstream |
The use of sold mining and rock processing equipment generates significant GHG emissions in our downstream value chain. In the double materiality assessment, we also considered emissions generated from other mining activities, such as energy usage for ventilation. |
||||
Reduction of GHG impacts |
Upstream, own operations, downstream |
The possibility for us to reduce GHG emissions is present throughout the value chain. Our main contribution is the potential to enable the transition through electrification and climate efficient technologies downstream. We work with research and development in our own operations to continue to develop sustainable solutions that supports climate transition. |
Potential contribution to limiting the effects of climate change. |
|||
Climate change |
Upstream, own operations, downstream |
The risk assessment for climate considered several different aspects that may affect the total risk. Factors considered included entities at climate risk, insured value and possible lost business, costs for climate adaptation activities, supply chain and customer disruptions, legal requirements and external expectations and physical climate impacts that can generate effects throughout the Sandvik value chain. |
|
|||
Climate change |
Own operations |
Climate opportunities exist within all Sandvik business areas, both in product development and offering. Some examples are electrification, low carbon products and service offering. With the transition to a low-carbon economy, Sandvik has the opportunity to supply customers with electrified mining equipment, low carbon cutting tools and energy efficient products. |
|
|||
|
||||||
E1-1 Transition plan for climate change mitigation
Sandvik has made a long-term commitment to address climate change by setting science-based targets consistent with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi).
GHG reduction targets and decarbonization levers
Our transition plan for climate change mitigation outlines our key levers to reach our GHG emission reduction targets. Our GHG emission reduction targets and their compatibility with the limiting of global warming to 1.5°C in line with the Paris Agreement are further disclosed within E1-4.
For own operations, we see efficiency measures and usage of fossil-free energy as key enablers for reducing GHG emissions. We approach our scope 1 and 2 emissions through the lens of transportation, production processes, and electricity usage. Our waterfall diagram on scope 1 and 2 reduction is based on these decarbonization levers.
About 65 percent of our value chain emissions are tied to the usage of our sold mining and rock processing products. Reducing these downstream emissions by developing solutions that reduce tailpipe emissions is a key priority. Applicable solutions include, for example, efficiency measures, and engines running on renewable fuels and electrification. In the upstream value chain, initiatives targeting resource efficiency, circularity, and purchasing goods with less embedded GHG emissions are key enablers for reducing GHG emissions. Uncertainties remain however, particularly regarding further developments in the fuel and electricity market, and customer preferences. These external factors are critical for achieving our long-term climate targets. The high degree of dependencies surrounding upstream and downstream emissions makes the mapping of a robust reduction pathway complex. However, we know our emissions hotspots and our focus lies on collaborating with suppliers and customers to reduce emissions. By developing and offering electrified mining and rock processing equipment that enhances customer productivity and profitability, we provide products that enable net zero within the industries that we serve.
The following table discloses our decarbonization levers and how GHG reduction is enabled.
Scope |
Decarbonization lever |
GHG reduction enabled by |
|---|---|---|
Scope 1 |
Decarbonization of transportation |
Efficiency measures, renewable fuels, electrification |
Scope 1 |
Decarbonization of production processes |
Efficiency measures, renewable fuels, electrification |
Scope 2 |
Fossil-free electricity |
Efficiency measures, fossil free-electricity |
Scope 3 |
Supply chain decarbonization |
Efficiency measures, recycled materials, increased circularity, low-carbon materials, new materials |
Scope 3 |
Decarbonization of transportation and distribution |
Efficiency measures, renewable fuels, electrification |
Scope 3 |
Decarbonization of product use phase |
Efficiency and productivity measures, R&D, electrification, renewable fuels, electric grid decarbonization |
The waterfall diagram below indicates how we aim to reduce our scope 1 and 2 emissions to 2030 and reach our related reduction targets.
Scope 1 and 2 roadmap to 2030, ton CO2eq (Market based)
Progress in implementing the transition plan
By the end of 2025, we achieved a -37 percent reduction of scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions, demonstrating that we are ahead of our SBTi approved targets for scope 1 and 2. This was achieved through efficiency measures, switching to renewable fuels, and using more fossil-free electricity. Within scope 3, our focus is on supplier engagement to reduce emissions from the supply chain and product development to reduce emissions from the use of sold products. Our scope 3 emissions in 2025 were stable compared to the 2019 baseline. More information about our progress is found within E1-4.
Alignment with business strategy and financial planning
Achieving our climate targets is central to our strategy and integrated into our annual business and financial planning. Consequently, the necessary Capital and Operational Expenditures (CAPEX and OPEX) to meet our climate targets and transition plan are included within the business strategy and financial planning for the relevant business segments.
Our ambition to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 and our 2030 GHG emissions targets are approved by the Group Executive Management team and the Board of Directors. Each business area and division contributes to the delivery of the targets, along with specific roadmaps on how to reach the targets.
Assessment of locked-in GHG emissions
Sandvik has conducted a qualitative assessment of potential locked-in GHG emissions from its key assets and products, as well as from the company’s value chain. The assessment indicates that our locked-in GHG emissions stem from the use of sold mining and rock-processing products. When calculating the impact from the use of our sold products, we account for the full anticipated lifespan of the products and take a conservative approach by assuming our non-electric vehicles are run on diesel, thereby assuming that the emissions are locked-in. However, all our combustion engine mining vehicles are equipped with engines that are compatible with renewable fuels/biofuels such as Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO). For certain product categories, such as rotary blast hole drills, we provide customers with the option to convert diesel-powered units to fully electrified versions in the field. By offering these alternatives, emissions from our products can be reduced during the product lifetime which reduces transition risks.
For electric equipment, the GHG emissions are closely linked to the electric grid mix of the country the product is sold to. Sales of electric equipment to countries with a higher share of fossil free electricity result in lower GHG emissions and less locked-in emissions.
We do not consider the locked-in emissions to pose a risk to achieving our GHG emission reduction targets. We are committed to reaching our net-zero target and provide solutions to our customers that have zero tailpipe emissions, such as our electric equipment. As a leading supplier of battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) we are committed to providing our customers with sustainable solutions that reduce their environmental footprint while also increasing efficiency and productivity.
EU taxonomy alignment and EU Paris-aligned benchmarks
Sandvik has minimal economic activity that falls under the scope of the EU taxonomy. As a result, we have not pursued plans for EU taxonomy alignment.
Sandvik is included in the EU Paris-aligned benchmarks.
E1-2 Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
Sandvik has adopted several policies and procedures to manage our material impacts, risks, and opportunities related to climate change mitigation and adaptation.
All climate-related policies and procedures are part of our group governance framework, The Sandvik Way, and accessible on our global intranet. More information on our policy governance is found under GOV-1. Our Code of Conduct, Supplier Code of Conduct, Business Partner Code of Conduct, Risk management policy and a short version of the Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) policy are accessible on our external website home.sandvik.
Impacts, |
Policy |
Scope |
Policy owner |
Key content |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Reduction of GHG impacts, climate change |
Sustainability policy |
Upstream, own operations, downstream |
Head of Group Communications and Sustainability |
|
Climate change |
Risk management policy and procedures |
Upstream, own operations, downstream |
General Counsel |
|
Reduction of GHG impacts |
Supplier Code of Conduct |
Upstream |
President of business area Rock Processing and sponsor of Procurement Council in Group Executive Management |
|
Reduction of GHG impacts |
Code of Conduct |
Own operations |
General Counsel |
|
Reduction of GHG impacts |
EHS policy |
Own operations |
Head of Human Resources |
|
Reduction of GHG impacts |
Energy efficiency and sourcing guideline |
Own operations |
Head of Human Resources |
|
Reduction of GHG impacts |
Business Partner Code of Conduct |
Downstream |
General Counsel |
|
E1-3 Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies
Our climate-related policies, along with group objectives and targets, guide our climate-related actions. Each business area develops plans to meet the Group objectives, with annual targets set to drive performance at all organizational levels. Our decentralized way of working empowers sites, divisions, and sales areas to implement mitigation actions that are relevant in their respective context or market. Common focus areas, ways of working, and best practices are shared and decided upon within the business areas and the Sandvik Group councils. The councils also appoint working groups to address specific topics on climate change, such as energy efficiency and sourcing.
As stated within E1-2, we require that all major sites (non-administrative Sandvik sites with more than 25 individuals) attain external ISO 14001 certification. At the end of 2025, about 75 percent of the established sites had achieved this certification (recently commenced and acquired sites excluded).
Through our community involvement and sponsorship activities, we have the opportunity to contribute to addressing climate-related challenges in the areas where we operate. For example, this may include supporting local communities with solutions to help mitigate the impacts of climate change.
The necessary Capital and Operational Expenditures (CAPEX and OPEX) to meet our climate targets and transition plan are embedded within the business strategy and financial planning for the relevant business segments. There were no significant monetary amounts of CAPEX and OPEX identified to implement the transition plan for 2025, and the years up to 2030.
In the following table, our climate-related implemented key actions in 2025 are disclosed and linked to our decarbonization levers. The actual GHG reductions resulting from the implemented key actions are included in our GHG calculations, disclosed in E1-6. Expected reductions from future actions are incorporated into our transition plan which is disclosed in E1-1.
IRO/Decarbonization lever |
Description |
Scope |
Key actions |
Time horizon |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Decarbonization of transportation (scope 1) |
Actions to reduce emissions from transportation and mobile equipment include efficiency measures, fuel switching to renewable fuels, as well as electrifying transportation. |
Own operations globally |
|
2025 |
|
2025 |
|||
|
2025 |
|||
Decarbonization of production processes (scope 1) |
Actions to reduce emissions from production processes and stationary equipment include efficiency measures, fuel switching to renewable fuels, as well as electrifying processes. |
Own operations globally |
|
2025 |
|
2025 |
|||
|
2025 |
|||
Fossil-free electricity (scope 2) |
Actions to reduce emissions from electricity include efficiency measures and utilizing fossil-free electricity. |
Own operations globally |
|
2025 |
|
2025 |
|||
Supply chain decarbonization (scope 3, category 1) |
Sourcing of low-carbon materials and circularity/ecodesign initiatives are integral parts of reducing emissions from purchased input materials. We create circular business models to keep valuable materials in circulation, for instance by running buyback/recycling programs for our used tools and carbide drill bits. Our Bergla® tungsten carbide powder is made entirely of recycled material. We run reconditioning programs for our solid round tools and refurbishment programs to prolong the life of our mining and rock processing equipment. |
Upstream globally |
|
2025 |
|
2025 |
|||
|
The closed-loop approach has been in place for more than 15 years. |
|||
Decarbonization of transportation and distribution (scope 3, category 4 and 9) |
Initiatives that reduce GHG emissions in scope 3 category 4 and 9, on upstream and downstream transportation and distribution. For instance, efficiency measures, changing mode of transport, fuel switching and electrification. |
Upstream and downstream distribution globally |
|
2025 |
Decarbonization of product use phase (scope 3, category 11) |
The largest contribution we can make is to help our customers undergo a sustainable transition in mining, manufacturing, and infrastructure through the solutions we provide. Our electric mining and rock processing equipment increases our customers’ productivity, while reducing their environmental impact, and helping them to reach their sustainability targets. |
Downstream globally |
|
2025 |
|
2025 |
|||
|
2025 |
|||
|
2025 |
|||
|
2025 |
|||
Climate adaptation |
We work to reduce the physical risks posed by climate change and strengthen resilience across our operations. |
Own operations globally |
|
2025 |
|
2025 |
E1-4 Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
Climate change mitigation
In 2023, our targets to reduce GHG emissions were validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). We are committed to:
Reduce absolute scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 50% by 2030, with 2019 as the baseline.
Reduce absolute scope 3 emissions by 30% by 2030, with 2019 as the baseline.
Reduce absolute scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 90% by 2040, with 2019 as the baseline.
Reach net-zero GHG emissions across the value chain by 2050 at the latest.
In 2025, we reached a scope 1 and 2 reduction of -37 percent (-37), compared to the 2019 baseline. Our scope 3 emissions in 2025 were stable compared to the 2019 baseline. Progress on our 2030 targets is disclosed below.
Scope 1 and 2, ton CO2eq (market-based)
Scope 3, ton CO2eq
We have not adopted any group-wide targets related to renewable energy deployment, energy efficiency, and transitional risk mitigation. As a highly decentralized, global and diverse company, targets on, for instance, energy efficiency are implemented at division and site level. We track the effectiveness of our policies through several monitoring processes, where each policy outlines how compliance is monitored. The monitoring includes internal control, employee surveys, and internal and external audits.
To achieve our GHG emission reduction targets, we consult with employees, customers, and suppliers to determine new technologies to, for instance, advance our product offering and optimize production processes within our operations. The integration of these technologies is important for meeting our targets. Sandvik is a global, industrial technology group providing solutions that enhance productivity, profitability, and sustainability for the mining, manufacturing, and infrastructure industries, adopting and developing new technologies is at the core of our business. “Accelerate digital” is one of our strategic objectives. We see a growing opportunity to develop our customer offering through digital solutions, to support our customers to become more efficient, productive, and automated. Digitalization is a tool for us to stay competitive and develop sustainable solutions.
Baseline |
Baseline value, ton CO2eq |
|---|---|
Scope 1 and 2, 2019 |
258,429 |
Scope 3, 2019 |
8,107,000 |
The International Energy Agency (IEA) climate scenario Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario (NZE) served as our underlying policy and climate scenario when we set the targets. The scenario describes what is needed for the global energy sector to achieve net‐zero CO2eq emissions by 2050. The targets have not been derived using a sectoral decarbonization pathway, as no relevant pathway is available for our type of sector.
We monitor and review the scope 1 and 2 target progress at all levels within the organization on a quarterly basis. The data collection is based on the quarterly energy and GHG reporting that takes place on location level. More information about our reporting principles is found within E1-5 Energy consumption and mix and E1-6 Gross scopes 1, 2, 3, and total GHG emissions. We are on track towards reaching our 2030 scope 1 and 2 target.
We monitor and review the scope 3 target progress on a divisional, business area and Group level annually. The data collection is based on our scope 3 inventory. More information about our reporting principles is found within E1-6 Gross scopes 1, 2, 3, and total GHG emissions. The current progress pace is lagging behind the linear target progress for the near-term scope 3 target.
Our decarbonization levers and their overall contributions to achieve the GHG emissions reduction targets are described in the following table.
Scope |
Decarbonization lever |
Description |
Overall quantitative contributions to achieve the GHG emission reduction targets |
|---|---|---|---|
Scope 1 |
Decarbonization of transportation |
Actions to reduce emissions from transport and mobile equipment include efficiency measures, fuel switching to renewable fuels, as well as electrifying transport. |
Approximately 1% |
Scope 1 |
Decarbonization of production processes |
Actions to reduce emissions from production processes and stationary equipment include efficiency measures, fuel switching to renewable fuels, as well as electrifying processes. |
|
Scope 2 |
Fossil-free electricity |
Actions to reduce emissions from electricity include efficiency measures and utilizing fossil-free electricity. |
Approximately 1% |
Scope 3 |
Decarbonization of product use phase |
Initiatives that reduce our scope 3 category 11 emissions. For instance, more energy-efficient products, electric products, and eco-efficient rock processing. |
Approximately 65% |
Scope 3 |
Supply chain decarbonization |
Initiatives that reduce our scope 3 category 1 emissions. For instance, changing input materials to ones with less embedded GHG emissions, circularity efforts to close the loop, resource efficiency measures. |
Approximately 25% |
Scope 3 |
Decarbonization of transportation and distribution |
Initiatives that reduce GHG emissions in scope 3, category 4 and 9, on upstream and downstream transportation, and distribution. For instance, efficiency measures, changing mode of transport, fuel switching, and electrification. |
Approximately 5% |
Other Scope 3 initiatives |
Other scope 3 initiatives |
Initiatives that reduce our scope 3 emissions within other categories than the ones mentioned above. |
Approximately 3% |
§ Reporting principles
All greenhouse gases, facilities, activities, geographies, operations, and scope 3 categories are included in our GHG reduction targets. We employ the operational control approach, as outlined in the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard. We include all our subsidiaries’ emissions under operational control in the target boundary, which aligns with our GHG inventory boundaries. We do not have any significant joint ventures.
Our targets are gross targets, meaning that we do not include GHG removals, carbon credits or avoided emissions as a means of achieving the GHG emission reduction targets. Scope 1 and 2 relates to approximately 1 percent of our total GHG emissions each, whereas scope 3 relates to approximately 98 percent. For scope 2, the targets refer to market-based GHG emissions.
Our baseline and baseline values are disclosed in the baseline table. 2019 was selected as the base year since it was considered to be the most recent representative year prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Climate change adaptation
Sandvik has not adopted any specific targets on climate adaptation on a Group level. Sandvik recognizes the importance of addressing climate change adaptation in relation to physical risks. This aspect is addressed in our Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process, business contingency plans, and our insurance-focused site visits. We track the effectiveness of our policies through several monitoring processes, where each policy outlines how compliance is monitored.
E1-5 Energy consumption and mix
MWh |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
Fossil energy consumption |
|
|
|
Fuel consumption from coal and coal products |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Fuel consumption from crude oil and petroleum products |
174,124 |
169,541 |
153,842 |
Fuel consumption of diesel for backup power |
106 |
1,128 |
3,291 |
Fuel consumption from natural gas |
187,287 |
192,814 |
195,842 |
Fuel consumption from other fossil sources |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, or cooling from fossil sources |
223,243 |
214,074 |
210,415 |
Total fossil energy consumption |
584,759 |
577,557 |
563,390 |
Share of fossil sources in total energy consumption, % |
51.9 |
51.0 |
51.1 |
Nuclear energy consumption |
|
|
|
Total consumption from nuclear sources |
159,732 |
276,586 |
374,495 |
Share of consumption from nuclear sources in total energy consumption, % |
14.2 |
24.4 |
34.0 |
Renewable energy consumption |
|
|
|
Fuel consumption from renewable sources, including biomass (also comprising industrial and municipal waste of biologic origin), biofuels, biogas, hydrogen from renewable sources |
9,102 |
9,572 |
10,152 |
Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from renewable sources |
365,364 |
256,550 |
141,144 |
Consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewable energy |
8,334 |
11,586 |
13,427 |
Total renewable energy consumption |
382,800 |
277,708 |
164,722 |
Share of renewable sources in total energy consumption, % |
34.0 |
24.5 |
14.9 |
Total energy consumption |
1,127,291 |
1,131,851 |
1,102,607 |
MWh/MSEK |
2024 |
2025 |
Yearly change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
Total energy consumption from activities in high climate impact sectors per net revenue from activities in high climate impact sectors |
9.2 |
9.1 |
–1 |
§ Reporting principles
The energy data is sourced from our Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) reporting system, with reporting occurring quarterly at the entity level. The collection of energy data primarily relies on information provided by suppliers and electricity meter readings. A minimal share of the energy data is estimated by using external statistics and industry averages.
The energy data is offset by one month, allowing time for data collection, quality control, and consolidation. The energy data is gathered for the period January to November, the December data is estimated based on the previous year’ December data. All energy data refers to continuing operations. The historical data has been updated to include acquisitions and to reflect our organizational structure as of 2025, to get a comparable dataset.
Data on grid electricity consumption from nuclear and renewable sources are accounted for based on Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs). Grid electricity consumption not covered by EACs are accounted as electricity from fossil sources. District heating consumption with a CO2eq emission factor above zero is accounted as heat produced from fossil sources. District heating consumption with a CO2eq emission factor of zero is accounted as heat produced from renewable sources.
Net revenue is based on the Group’s total revenue in the income statement. All Sandvik activities are defined as “high climate impact sectors". Our activities are included as manufacturing in the NACE sector C.
E1-6 Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3, and Total GHG emissions
|
Retrospective |
Targets |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scope, ton CO2eq |
Baseline 2019 |
2024 |
2025 |
Yearly change, % |
2030 |
2050 |
Annual % target / |
Scope 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross scope 1 GHG emissions |
99,979 |
81,458 |
78,326 |
–4 |
Reduce scope 1 and 2 with 50% |
Net zero |
–3% |
Percentage of scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated emission trading schemes, % |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Scope 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross location-based scope 2 GHG emissions |
215,054 |
216,042 |
217,754 |
1 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Gross market-based scope 2 GHG emissions |
158,450 |
80,938 |
84,232 |
4 |
Reduce scope 1 and 2 with 50% |
Net zero |
–3% |
Scope 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross indirect (scope 3) GHG emissions |
8,107,000 |
8,211,000 |
8,145,000 |
–1 |
Reduce with 30% |
Net zero |
–3% |
Category 1: Purchased goods and services |
1,768,000 |
2,184,000 |
2,046,000 |
–6 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Category 2: Capital goods |
62,000 |
41,000 |
47,000 |
15 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Category 3: Fuel and energy related actions |
52,000 |
80,000 |
76,000 |
–5 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution |
321,000 |
271,000 |
376,000 |
39 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Category 5: Waste generated in operation |
26,000 |
22,000 |
22,000 |
0 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Category 6: Business travel |
79,000 |
55,000 |
58,000 |
5 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Category 7: Employee commuting |
57,000 |
55,000 |
57,000 |
4 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Category 8: Upstream leased assets |
8,000 |
6,000 |
6,000 |
0 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution |
11,000 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
0 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Category 10: Processing of sold goods |
6,000 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
0 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Category 11: Use of sold products |
5,709,000 |
5,489,000 |
5,449,000 |
–1 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products |
7,000 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
0 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Category 13: Downstream leased assets |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Category 14: Franchises |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Category 15: Investments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Total GHG emissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GHG emissions, location-based |
8,422,033 |
8,508,500 |
8,441,080 |
–1 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Total GHG emissions, market-based |
8,365,429 |
8,373,396 |
8,307,558 |
–1 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Ton CO2eq |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
Scope 1 |
2,094 |
2,117 |
2,364 |
Scope 3 |
16,000 |
14,000 |
14,000 |
Ton CO2eq/MSEK |
2024 |
2025 |
Yearly change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
Total GHG emissions (location-based) per net revenue |
69 |
70 |
1 |
Total GHG emissions (market-based) per net revenue |
68 |
69 |
1 |
Scope 1 and 2 intensity (ton/MSEK) – entity specific metric
§ Reporting principles
Scope 1 and 3 calculations encompasses carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydroflourocarbons (HFCs), perflourocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexaflouride (SF6), and nitrogen triflouride (NF3). The scope 2 calculations are limited to CO2 emissions since it is the only emission that energy companies are obligated to report. Thus the emission factors are also limited to CO2. This exclusion is estimated to represent less than 1 percent of total emissions.
Emission factors sourced from the UK Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, Ecoinvent, IEA, US EPA Power Profiler, Canada’s National Inventory Report, and Exiobase, are utilized along with supplier-specific data. Emission factors represent Global Warming Potential values based on a 100-year time horizon (GWP100).
Scope 1 and 2 calculations are based on energy consumption data, reported on a quarterly basis by our entities in our EHS reporting system. For details, see E1-5 reporting principles.
Reporting of biogenic emissions are limited to scope 1 and 3. Scope 1 biogenic emissions relate to the use of biofuels, such as ethanol, biogas, and bio-based fractions of gasoline and diesel, within our own operations. We account for a reduction in fossil GHG scope 1 emissions following our purchase of biogas, which takes place through contractual instruments. Location-based and market-based emission factors for scope 2 do not separate the percentage of biomass or biogenic CO2, CH4, and N2O, and therefore scope 2 biogenic emissions are not reported. Biogenic scope 3 emissions are related to the bio-based fraction of diesel within use of sold products.
Within scope 2, we monitor both location-based and market-based GHG emissions, where the difference is due to the purchase of renewable or fossil-free energy certificates. In 2025, about 75 percent of the grid electricity was covered by renewable and nuclear energy certificates.
Scope 3 emissions are calculated on an annual basis and consolidated to Sandvik Group level. In our scope 3 calculations, we employ a hybrid approach combining both screening and inventory-based methodologies. It is important to apply caution when analyzing scope 3 data, as it represents a complex methodology and includes data uncertainty. Spend-based emission factors, including the influence of inflation and currency fluctuation, causes data uncertainty, and we aim to move away from spend-based data to enhance data reliability.
Our primary scope 3 categories are “1: Purchased goods and services” and “11: Use of sold products”. The “Purchased goods and services” category is primarily influenced by the procurement of steel and cemented carbide. The “11: Use of sold products” category relates to fuel consumption, including diesel, and electricity in our sold mining and rock processing equipment. The data is based on sales volumes and the anticipated lifespan of these products. Collaborating closely with quality assurance, services, and repair teams allows us to extend the operational lifespan of our products. These activities will, however, increase the category 11 emissions as the emissions account for the entire life expectancy of the product. For sold products equipped with combustion engines, we take a conservative approach and assume the equipment is run on diesel. For electric equipment, GHG emissions are closely linked to the electric grid mix in the country the product is sold to. Sales of electric equipment to countries with a high share of fossil free electricity in their grid result in lower GHG emissions.
For the entity specific metric of scope 1 and 2 intensity, two separate intensity metrics are disclosed, both revenues at fixed exchange rates and revenues according to the income statement has been used.
E1-8 Internal carbon pricing
Sandvik Group has not implemented an internal carbon pricing procedure.